Never Walk Away

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Archive for November, 2008

Fuel for the Fire: What Feeds Right-Wing Christianity?

Posted by G G on November 30, 2008

At one point, I decided to sit down and ask myself an important question. What makes right-wing Christianity so attractive to so many people? Why is it that conservative (i.e. anti-gay) churches and religious organizations gain so many members while liberal denominations like the Episcopalians aren’t doing so well despite their inclusiveness? There are some books available that detail this phenomenon, but one Catholic priest that I talked to had a theory:

“People tend to shift to the (anti-gay) right in the Catholic Church, and religion in general, because they’re not comfortable with the fact that life contains a lot of ambiguity. They want to grab onto something solid.”

This priest hit something vital. Ever since the 1960s, when Vatican II, the sexual revolution and massive cultural changes began, America has been changing quickly. Things that we once accepted as absolute fact, such as the immorality of interracial marriages or same-sex relationships, are no longer that clear cut. The sexual revolution, while having the (in my opinion) positive effect of opening up vital discussions about sex and its role in our lives, had the additional negative effect of increasing promiscuity and demonizing the virtues of abstinence. In some ways, the pendulum swung too far to the left in American society when it came to sex. This all contributed to a sense of chaos among many Americans. They saw larger society around them going out of control, with no sense of moral center. Therefore, they have decided to cling to religious traditions that set strict guidelines and moral codes. The rigidity almost provides a sort of protection from being swept into the chaos. Indeed, Pope Benedict XVI was at least partially correct when he said that a “moral relativism” was becoming a problem in the world. If by moral relativism he meant a sense of “let’s do anything we want because it feels good or because we can” then he’s right, and that kind of attitude should be fought, but not to the extent that it stifles any kind of principled dissenting opinion (like on women’s ordination, married priests, LGBT issues, etc.).

We’ve identified part of the problem. Of course, the phenomenon of right-wing Christianity is much more complicated than what I’ve said above. It’s not all that simple, but what should be the guiding light for a generation like mine in need of one? Is it blind obedience to the pope or to the Catholic hierarchy? No. Is it selective Biblical fundamentalism? No. The solution, in my own mind, is to live the Gospel values. That is the antidote to any kind of fundamentalism or moral relativism. Jesus said that all of the commandments can be summed up into two: Love God and your neighbor. Everything else flows from that.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

A List of things to be thankful for this Thanksgiving

Posted by G G on November 27, 2008

As much as I love America, I’ve noticed that a lot of my fellow Americans tend to spend more time complaining about what they don’t have rather than being thankful for what they do have. In many ways, we’ve been spoiled as a country. Let’s consider what we all have to be thankful for.

For all of us, let us be thankful that we’re alive. Tomorrow is never promised, so live it up today.

For those us who will be celebrating Thanksgiving with our families and friends, let us be thankful for that. There are many out there who will not have that luxury, such as the poor and our troops overseas.

For those of us with families, let us be thankful for them. They may annoy us and even cause us heartbreak, but at least we have them.

For those of us with beloved spouses or significant others, let us be thankful for them. Many others out there wish they had such a profound iintimacy in their lives.

For those of us with good friends, let us be thankful for them. A good friend is a gift that we all deserve.

For those of us who have a good house, food, clothes, etc., let us be thankful for our material comfort and everything that we have. Many others on this planet must endure without the things we have.

For those of us who are in good health, let us be thankful for that. There are many others who are not in the position of being able to enjoy their lives without serious mental or physical disability.

For those of us who are in college, let us be thankful for the fact that we are able to be in college. Not everyone our age can afford it, or must work extra hard to be there.

For those of us who have jobs, let us be thankful for that, especially in these times of economic trouble when others are not as fortunate.

For those of us who are able to be openly LGBT, let us be thankful that we can live openly in our homes, schools, jobs or wherever we have that ability. Many other LGBT people throughout the world must live in the closet out of fear, some for their whole lives.

For those of us who live in America, let us be thankful that we have brave men and women in uniform working to keep us safe from those who would harm us, and who are doing so much good in the world. Let us be thankful that we can still criticize our government without fear of imprisonment or worse, that we have the right to vote, that we can peacefully protest and that we can pursue our dreams.

God bless you all on this Thanksgiving. Remember what you have to be thankful for!

Posted in Main | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

The Five Reasons Why I Stay (besides the fact that I’m an annoying little pest)

Posted by G G on November 25, 2008

While many of my readers probably haven’t bothered to browse a lot of so-called “Catholic” websites and blogs, I have, and I’ve noticed a trend that I’ve seen in the larger Catholic Church as a whole: a lot of really angry, right-wing Catholics. One blogger, Fr. Joseph O’Leary, labeled them “neocaths.” Gotta admit, it sounds like a cool name! Anyway, these websites and blogs aren’t hard to find at all. Instead of going into all of the reasons for this apparent rise in right-wing Catholicism (I say “apparent” because I don’t think most Catholics are actually aligned with them), I think that given all of the Vatican’s anti-gay statements and doctrines, which line up perfectly with these individuals, that it begs a question: why do I, and other LGBT Catholics, stay in such a hostile climate? After all, wouldn’t it make more sense to find a more affirming denomination of Christianity?

The most important reason that I don’t walk out of the Catholic Church is because that’s exactly what these right-wing forces want. Don’t believe me? Just go and browse some of these “neocath” blogs and websites. Inevitably, they will say something to the effect of “if you don’t adhere to this particular doctrine, then why don’t you just leave?” And therien lies the answer to why I haven’t left. I won’t give my opponents the benefit of seeing me do what they want! Sorry, but I’m here to stay.

Another reason is that I stay to assist other LGBT Catholics who probably feel isolated in a Church that has officially swung to the right over the past several years. A visible LGBT presence is vital for them, since I don’t want them to think that they’re alone. Even if I become the only LGBT Catholic left in the Church, then at least I can say that I persevered until the end.

A third reason, and perhaps most important on a practical level, is that not all parishes and religious communities in the Church are the same. Not all bend so easily to the Vatican’s will. Some are quite open and affirming on the local level. I won’t give out any names of such parishes or religious communities, since one “neocath” website published the names of such allegedly affirming Catholic parishes and religious communities as a way to “expose” them to “the Faithful” (i.e. those that agree with them) and hopefully get them to stop being so affirming of LGBT people. All I can say is that they’re out there. Contact the nearest Dignity USA chapter or New Ways Ministry. They might be able to help you find an affirming parish. Or better yet, shop around and talk to individual priests in different parishes near you.

That leads me into the fourth reason, which is that I’m not bound to stay in a Catholic parish that I dislike. I have the freedom to vote with my feet and leave, which is exactly what I did. Once I realized my new parish priest was not supportive at all, I simply shook the dust from my sandals and went to another Catholic parish! The freedom of movement can make it better to deal with.

The fifth reason is that I truly think that there is room in Catholic moral theology for being in a healthy, LGBT relationship. It’s too complicated to go into, but there’s been a lot of scholarly work done by brave priests (some of whom, like Fr. Charles Curran and John McNeill, have been silenced by the Vatican in one way or another) and lay people when it comes to affirming LGBT people within the Church. At some point I should attach a list of good Catholic readings for LGBT people. Even though the official dogma denounces consummation of LGBT relationships (i.e. the sexual component), part of life is learning to live with contradictions, just as Catholic couples using birth control and those that have been divorced and remarried, etc., must also learn to live with. How each person manages to find their peace with God is between that person and God Himself.

I think I can sum up why I haven’t left the Catholic Church, or anything else that gives me grief from time to time, in the three words that I chose as the name of this blog: Never Walk Away. I don’t mean that we shouldn’t pick our battles wisely or that surrender is never the right thing to do, but when you honestly believe that it’s best to stay and stand your ground, as I have, then do so without looking back.

Goodbye and God bless you all!

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

LGBT rights and abortion: a controversial blog post

Posted by G G on November 24, 2008

I’ve often contemplated a curious irony: the fact that President Bush is opposed to most legalized abortion, yet supports the war and the death penalty, and the fact that President-elect Obama supports legalized abortion yet opposes the death penalty and probably the war too. It’s interesting to consider the fact that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans really value human life from conception to natural death, if you believe, as I do, that human life starts at conception. Even if you don’t think that human life starts at conception, consider the amount of Democrats who voted to authorize the Iraq War! Sure, President Bush got us into it, but only because our representatives allowed him to.

To be sure, some right-wing Catholics and Christians of other denominations will froth at the mouth at this description. “How can you compare the life of a serial killer to the lives of unborn children?” is typically how the argument will play out, with the implication being that the murderer deserved to die but the unborn children didn’t. Let me respond to that question with a few questions of my own: First, how do you know that the serial killer was actually guilty? What if he wasn’t? Who gives you the right to take life away? And why is it not OK to kill unborn children in the womb but apparently it’s OK to pre-emptively attack and cause the deaths of thousands of Iraqis, and our own soldiers, in the process? As far as I’m concerned, you’re either pro-life from start to finish or you’re not. The US Catholic bishops harp on abortion as though it’s the only form of killing that exists, and must form the basis for all Catholic votes. Apparently pre-emptive war doesn’t matter as much, even though the Vatican itself condemned the invasion, and the death penalty is just something we shouldn’t worry much about (after all, the Vatican could probably tell us a lot about war and the death penalty considering how often it used both to silence dissent!).

While some probably think I’ve made a good point, a more fundamental question is probably forming in most readers minds: why would I, a gay person, be pro-life? It’s a good question, considering the polarizing climate of “red” vs. “blue” that exists in America. A short answer could be that I’m neither red nor blue but some shade of purple! Seriously though, being gay doesn’t mean that I have to automatically align myself with every left-wing cause that exists in this country. Simply because I love men doesn’t mean that I have to think that abortion is right. The two do not need to be connected, although they often are in the complicated world of politics. Does being Catholic have anything to do with it? Sure, but there’s another aspect to it that a lot of people never think about. Consider what will happen if a gay gene is isolated. Doctors can already do some pretty advanced testing on a fetus to determine how it will turn out. What happens if a test for a gay gene, if it is discovered, can be used to determine the probable sexual orientation of the fetus, and a woman decides that she doesn’t want a gay child? Don’t think it will happen? Consider this bill that a Maine legislator introduced: Maine gay abortion bill

Some would criticize this bill on several grounds, such as the probability of ever finding a gay gene, let alone a test for it, and the slippery slope theory that is often used by right-wingers to baselessly argue against gay marriages. But there’s a critical difference: gay marriages in Canada, Massachusetts and Connecticut have not caused a societal collapse, as the right-wing in this country predicted. But the ability to test for certain things in utero has enabled sex-selective abortions (just go to China to see that), as well as the abortions of disabled fetuses (consider how many Down’s Syndrome fetuses are aborted; I think the number is close to 80%). The slippery slope with abortion has already been realized in that respect because of scientific advances, and I fear that with the advances in genetic science being made every day, that the next abortions will be used to get rid of gay fetuses. That’s why I’m pro-life from conception to grave, and why most of our politicians on both sides of the political spectrum are hypocrites for supporting human life only in some circumstances. Both Democrats and Republicans should be ashamed of themselves.

Now comes the tricky part. Should the goal of the pro-life movement be to overturn Roe v. Wade? Well, I hate to say it, but it’s unlikely that the court decision that legalized abortion in all 50 states will be overturned anytime soon. And even if it was overturned tomorrow, it would only return the decision about abortion to the states, and look what just happened in our most recent election: All ballot initiatives to restrict abortion in some way failed, including one measure in conservative South Dakota that would have banned all abortion except for rape, incest or the health of the mother. Efforts to restrict abortion aren’t getting anywhere, so why not consider another alternative: make abortions as rare as possible. If it can’t be legally stopped (and it appears that it can’t), then make a moral case to American girls and women. Provide more birth control and more health services to pregnant women. I personally see an interesting trend, at least in my own area and in my own circle of friends: a lot of young women my own age that I’ve spoken to aren’t too keen on making abortion totally illegal, but they personally wouldn’t choose to have one. They aren’t any more conservative politically (certainly my generation as a whole isn’t lurching to the right, thank God!), but from my perspective they seem to dislike the idea of abortion in general. The statistics might support such a conclusion: abortions have, overall, declined in numbers since 1975 (google it). While the right-wingers will jump on this to say “look how effective our abstinence education programs and abortion restriction laws are!” and the left-wingers will say “see, legalized access to abortion reduces the numbers of them!”, I’m not so sure that either side is really seeing the whole picture, as usual. In addition to that trend that I mentioned, did anyone ever consider that maybe more American teens are using contraception? I’ve certainly seen that, even on my own Catholic college campus. Oh wait, I forgot, the Catholic Church doesn’t want contraception either. I guess we just can’t win with the Vatican, can we?

Either way, right-wing organizations would do well not to get too cocky. Even as abortions decrease in sheer numbers, and as more people around me reject abortion on a personal level (even if not legal), support for gay rights is increasing all across the board. While my positions on these issues may be unpopular right now, I suspect that more people might take my words and the words of those like me who are in the unpopular minority of being both pro-life and pro-gay into consideration as time goes on. I pray that more LGBT people and people in general will come to realize the inherent value and dignity of all life from conception until natural death.

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The “gay community”: a passing trend?

Posted by G G on November 23, 2008

You know, I hear this term “gay community” thrown around a lot. During this past election season, I also heard terms like “black community” or “black America” and “Latinos”, etc. thrown around. Being a white male, I have to wonder why the term “white community” has never been employed in the media.

So what is the “gay community?” I think the term and all that it implies is itself problematic, because I think that the “gay community” is actually a temporary phenomenon that was created by homophobia in America. First of all, America is becoming an increasingly polarized country politically. A much more progressive, liberal younger generation is emerging and displacing an older, more conservative crowd, which may be one of the things that catapulted Barack Obama to victory. My 85-year old great-aunt told me over the phone after Obama was elected that “this election was a fight between my generation and yours, and yours won.” I think this is a little oversimplified, but her point is well taken. These polarizations in America are, I think, caused in part by this generation gap. Anytime someone feels threatened, they tend to seek out others like them with the same goals and cling to those people to form safe groups. It creates a nice comfort zone. Consider places like San Francisco, Provincetown, Key West, Ogunquit, etc. They’re all known primarily for having a strong LGBT presence, and they may serve an important role for LGBT people who need to leave a strongly homophobic household or local community. This forms the most visible aspect of the “gay community.” When gay pride parades take place in major cities, these also constitute the “gay community” as do “gay ghettos” in some cities (Albany, NY has a spot called Lark Street that’s pretty LGBT friendly). Believe it or not, I personally have to wonder whether a lot of the predominantly gay neighborhoods and communities will actually melt away over time, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Being gay has become much more mainstream than it was even as recently as the 1990s, and I’m personally seeing a greater integration of gay and straight people into each other’s social networks. This article confirms my perceptions. For example, I recently went to one restaurant in Albany with a friend of mine that catered mostly to LGBT people at one time, but the manager told me that she now has an equal number of straight people there, even though its reputation was as an LGBT place. Even gay bars are having increasing numbers of straight visitors, especially straight women, and I’ve even seen some straight guys going into them to express solidarity with their gay friends. The gay-straight alliance at my college has about half of its membership identifying as straight. Parties up in our apartments will have both straight and gay people mixing with one another. While some LGBT people decry this as being a potential loss of an LGBT group identity, I think that might be a good thing. The more LGBT people that there are out in straight social networks, the more straight people will be exposed to them. This will, I think, lead to a greater tolerance in our society. When American society as a whole was still rampantly homophobic, and networking via the internet was unknown, such communities served as a refuge. But now I think gay people are integrating themselves into mainstream American society without the need for these networks and communities, at least on a permanent basis. What about those LGBT people who still wish to maintain a separate identity? Personally, I don’t agree with that philosophy. Some LGBT people will literally make out being gay to be almost like an ethnicity or a tribal group! This phenomenon can also be seen in other groups. We always talk about “Italian-Americans” or “African-Americans” or “Asian-Americans.” Being “gay-Americans” is the same way with these particular LGBT people and I think that’s also the hidden implication of the term “gay community.” Yet this is, I think, a passing trend, at least from where I’m standing, and I hope that it will be the same for the other groups that I mentioned. I hope that as we all mix together more, that we’ll stop trying to always think in terms of what particular “group” we belong to, and start seeing ourselves for what we are: people. We’re all the children of God, regardless of religion, race/ethnicity, class, gender, age, sexuality, etc. I’ll gladly wear a rainbow headband or sport a pride wristband, but there is only one flag that will ever fly in front of my home: the American flag. We are of course first members of one human race on the most basic level of our existence, but on the cultural, political and social levels we are Americans, and we must never lose sight of that. The only hypen that should be next to the word “American” is the word “people.” We are the American-people.

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Et tu, Governor Huckabee?

Posted by G G on November 21, 2008

Governor Huckabee

Looks like our dear friend Governor Huckabee is at it again. On the morning of 11/19/2008, he appeared on The View and reported said something that may have, in effect suggested that the rights of LGBT people aren’t actually civil rights because the LGBT community hasn’t been the victim of violence.

I wasn’t aware that the Holocaust, during which Hitler targeted and killed thousands of LGBT people in concentration camps (which is the origin of the pink triangle symbol), was not a violent event.

I wasn’t aware that the numerous LGBT kids that have been beaten up in school is not an example of violence.

I wasn’t aware that the people that we could call LGBT, who were burned at the stake as “sodomites” during the Middle Ages, weren’t the victims of violence.

So what exactly is your definition of violence Governor Huckabee? How much suffering should one undergo before being worthy of equal rights?

Unfortunately, it gets worse.

Back in January of this year, while he was trying to get nominated for president, he also reportedly drew connections between homosexual activity and bestiality. I’ve actually heard things like this a lot in the LGBT marriage movement: “if we let people of the same-sex marry, then why not let people marry their pets?” This type of logic is called the “slippery slope” idea, meaning that one thing must lead to another. But is this a valid comparison?

I have to wonder whether or not Governor Huckabee took any courses in psychology while in college. He does not appear to understand that bestiality poses a much more serious health risk to both the person involved and the animal. The nature of the pathogens which inhabit animals is different enough from humans to pose a severe risk to both the former and the latter. Also, animals are not legally or ethically capable of actually consenting to sexual activity. In order to consent to it, an animal would have to actually understand what is going on, have the option of saying no and realize all of the consequences involved. Animals do not possess the same level of intelligence that we do, and thus we cannot expect them to express consent. It would not only be a health risk, but also a grave ethical violation of animal rights (not to mention human dignity) to behave that way with an animal.

Sexual contact between non-related consenting adults is something completely different. While one can debate the ethical and moral value of sex outside of a committed relationship (such as a marriage or civil union), there is little doubt, at least in my own mind, that a consensual, adult sexual encounter between two non-related people is not on the same level as bestiality at all. There is a clear difference in terms of health risk and in terms of consent, not to mention in terms of psychology (zoophilia, aka bestiality, is listed as a paraphilia by the American Psychological Association (APA) whereas homosexuality is not; more on that later). To compare the two clearly exposes a deep-seated prejudice which borderlines on irrationality. I would respectfully advise Governor Huckabee to consult some of the scholarly publications from the APA, as well as some health journals, so that he can learn more about this topic, of which he has demonstrated a poor understanding.

Perhaps part of his logic is based on the fact that one of the traditional Biblical prohibitions on male same-sex activity in Leviticus 18 is located right near a prohibition on bestiality. There is a lot of Biblical commentary and scholarly work about the Levitical law codes, and why certain things appear in there. The prohibition of same-sex activity in Leviticus 18 is also located near a prohibition on having sex with one’s wife during her menstrual period. I wonder if Governor Huckabeee also considers that to be on the same level as homosexual activity. But then, it’s probably easier not to use such a comparison when so many Americans probably don’t pay attention to what time of the month it is when they’re having sex…

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Newt Gingrich and “Gay and Secular Fascism”

Posted by G G on November 19, 2008

Looks like former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has been complaining about a “gay and secular fascism” that is threatening to “use the government if it can get control of it.” Go to this link and watch the video interview with Bill O’Reilly to see the whole thing:

Newt Gingrich and “gay fascism”

Like many Americans, I am appalled at the actions of radical LGBT activists, disrupting church services (it’s hard to forget the fiasco when a group calling itself the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” invaded a Catholic church in California) and threatening religious individuals and homophobes. I absolutely condemn violence from either side of the issue of LGBT rights and marriage, as well as harassment and intimidation tactics. These tactics will not advance the cause of LGBT rights, but rather cause more Americans to be turned off to the LGBT rights movement in general. I would urge all rational LGBT people to stay away from these extremists, because they’re making LGBTs look bad.
That all being said, I find it curious that Newt Gingrich has seemingly lumped “gay” and “secular” as twin allies in a war against “traditional religion (read: anti-gay).” Apparently Mr. Gingrich doesn’t know about the numerous LGBT-friendly churches and synagogues out there (i.e. the Metropolitan Community Church, Dignity USA for Catholics, some Episcopal churches, etc.). I sense that he possesses a false assumption that all LGBT people are secular, non-religious activists or at least wants it to appear that way. Well, what about those who do believe in God? What about those LGBT people who do go to church and who do believe in Jesus Christ? Are they radical secularists too? The battle lines are not quite as clear as right-wing “Christians” would like it to be. To their horror, not all Christians subscribe to their homophobic agenda. This isn’t a war between Christians and gays, because it assumes that the two groups are mutually opposed, when in reality they need not be and aren’t always in reality. There are extremists on both sides trying to stoke the fires as much as possible, and Mr. Gingrich would do well to be very careful about lumping all LGBTs protesting their discrimination into radical, church-disrupting, intolerant leftists. Then again, with the election of Barack Obama, I can see why he might possibly be so petrified. Anti-gay sentiment is melting like a giant icecube: slowly but surely. Mr. Gingrich probably knows this and can’t stand it, but one way to keep anti-gay feelings from fading as quickly is to portray all LGBT people as violent extremists. It’s actually a great strategy if you’re a right-winger. Use these isolated incidents on the part of extremist protesters to paint all LGBT people with one color. What proof do I have that that’s what Mr. Gingrich wanted to do? He never bothered to distinguish between LGBT protesters who are not damaging property or threatening anyone (the majority), and those that are (the minority). I think it was also a poor choice of words to use “fascism,” even though I would agree that trying to suppress other opinions (i.e. storming churches during services, vandalism, screaming at opponents, etc.) is a hallmark trait of fascism. Yet again, he fails to distinguish the radicals from the moderate LGBT protesters. I have yet to hear of LGBT protesters setting up concentration camps to put their right-wing opponents in (although Hitler did just that for gays, among others!). I have yet to hear of LGBT people trying to actually ban political parties or groups that they don’t like. Has anyone been forced to be gay? No. Has any church been forced to perform a gay wedding? Not to my knowledge. But I do hear stories of the Concerned Women for America (CWA), a right-wing group, trying to get schools to ban GSAs (gay-straight alliances). Just go to their website and check it out for yourself. I do hear plenty about “ex-gay” camps and programs trying to brainwash LGBT people into being straight (Exodus International or Love Won Out). I do hear plenty about LGBT students getting beaten up and harassed in their schools. I hear plenty about LGBT partners being excluded from insurance coverage, immigration benefits, social security and even hospital visitation! Instead of focusing the spotlight of his interview with Bill O’Reilly on the LGBT extremists, who should rightly be condemned for their actions, why didn’t Mr. Gingrich also point out these aforementioned right-wing attacks on LGBT Americans? Perhaps because it would show that his side of the political spectrum has also committed abuses and excesses. Then again, it might also expose his own hypocrisy in trying to “protect the sancity of marriage” when he himself has been married 3 times!

The sad thing about all of this is that Mr. Gingrich appears to actually mean what he says, and isn’t merely joking, because I thought that he was joking when I heard him talking about “traditional religion” and respecting the sanctity of marriage. I could’ve sworn there was something in the Gospel of Mark, Chapter 10, that accurately sums up how Jesus felt about the “sanctity of marriage”: The disciples asked Jesus if a man could divorce his wife. Jesus replied that “he who divorces his wife and remarries another commits adultery against her.” Looks like “traditional religion” can cut both ways!

With all of this in mind, LGBT people must remember that people like Mr. Gingrich want us to react violently and with hatred. They feed off of it, because they can then use our anger to say to their supporters “see, the gays really are bad!” If Mr. Gingrich, or any group of right-wing people, is standing on a corner preaching against homosexuality, let them go. Ignore them and keep walking. It’s their right to free speech. Mr. Gingrich was free to say whatever he wanted while talking to Bill O’Reilly, just as I am free to say anything here. And so I will conclude with this warning for all LGBT protesters: do not give Mr. Gingrich the gift of violent and/or offensive responses to our discrimination. He and those like him will only use it against us, and it is morally wrong. Instead, nonviolence and passive resistance will do more damage to the right-wing in this country than anything else. Read about Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. Use their tactics. Above all else, remember that our opponents are people too. They need love and mercy, and despite the terrible pain that people like Mr. Gingrich cause us, we must learn to give them the love that they would deny us. Good bye and God bless you all.

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Coming Out Story

Posted by G G on November 17, 2008

Each morning, I wake up, I get dressed and I eat breakfast. I get ready to go to school, work or to run errands, whichever the case may be. While in my small Honda Accord, I’ll often plug in my ipod and continue listening to music while I drive. After I’m done doing whatever it is that I had planned for that day, I’ll return home, eat dinner, watch TV, socialize with my family, do some more work and then go to bed. On some Friday nights I’ll go out to the bars in Albany, either alone or with friends. I have a loving family and I always stay as involved in their lives as I can. I go to church on Sundays. I never involve myself in “one-night stands” that so many other college students engage in. Oh, I almost forgot to mention one thing: I’m gay. But before I go on, I’m curious about some things. Does everything I’ve described about myself conform with the mythical “gay lifestyle” that so many conservatives claim is destroying America? Does my daily routine make you think of me as a greater evil than al-Qaeda, as Representative Sally Kern of Oklahoma described of gay people in 2008? Do I seem like the type of person who caused the 9-11 attacks, as right-wing Rev. Jerry Falwell claimed of gays and lesbians? Maybe you don’t know me well enough to answer those questions. Let me tell you about myself.

Several years ago, writing this would have seemed unthinkable. It is truly remarkable to consider how far I’ve come in that time. This is the story of my coming out as a gay man. Whether you love it or hate it, it is the truth. I urge anyone reading this to put aside any stereotypes or preconceptions of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people (LGBT). Doing so will not only help you when reading this story, but it will also help you in current and future dealings with LGBT people.

My personal background isn’t that special or unique. I was born and raised in a suburban, Catholic household near Albany, NY. It was just me, my two parents and little sister. We were and still are a very close family. My sister was my constant companion while I was growing up, and I vividly remember our many adventures, whether we were on a playground somewhere or running down to the local hamburger joint for lunch when our parents weren’t home. We were both explorers, looking for new places to hang out, ride our bikes, building forts in the woods, etc. As I got older, my father never had a formal “birds and bees” talks with me due to his nervousness at discussing such issues. He admitted that it was hard for him to talk about these things since he never had a father of his own to teach him (my grandfather died when my father was 3), and the rest of his father’s relatives were hard-line Lebanese immigrants, where sex remains a tricky subject. Still, my father did his best, and answered a few difficult questions, but luckily I’ve always been an avid reader, so I never had a problem accessing information about it! I learned about sexual issues mostly from sex education classes throughout my elementary and middle school life, and later I’d learn more via the Internet. I was told about the normality of boys having “dirty” thoughts about girls and vice versa. I never questioned this or whether or not that was the only type of sexual relationship that could exist. My parents never discussed anything other than man-woman relationships in their lives. In my church and religion class we never discussed homosexuality. One day my mother was watching Oprah, as she sometimes still does. I was very young when this happened. Oprah was discussing something I couldn’t make out, and revealed a picture of two men kissing. I was shocked beyond all possible belief. My mother didn’t know I had seen this, or if she did she thought I’d forget it quickly. Why would anyone want to kiss someone of the same sex? How could this be possible? I dismissed it as a disease or abnormality and went on with my life.

I’m not sure when the average time is for boys to begin experiencing sexual feelings, but I think in my case I matured later than other guys. In 8th grade I started becoming interested in dating, but not sex per se. That was only for marriage, as all good little Catholic boys knew. I decided it was time to do what everyone else did and get a girlfriend. After a few anonymous boxes of chocolate and flowers I was quickly going out with “Janice” (not her real name). We had a nice relationship but I had no real desire to kiss her or do anything else that I saw all of the other guys doing with their girlfriends. I kissed her once, but only quickly and blandly. I felt no sexual feelings for her. I would, on occasion, have dreams of sex with women, but would experience no excitement whatsoever. Unfortunately for both of us, our “relationship” was little more than a close friendship. There was never any sex, although Janice told me that she wanted it. I don’t think the feeling was ever mutual. Around the time I began my relationship with Janice, I started feeling myself wanting to spend time with other guys, and not Janice. I couldn’t put a finger on it. I started inviting guys over to my house to chill out, and we would get together and eat, watch TV, etc. Somehow though I had the feeling of wanting something more, something I couldn’t get from Janice or from any casual friendship.

Janice and I didn’t have too many classes together. In fact, during 8th grade I don’t think we had any together. I remember that I had a math class that year which produced my first crush, although I didn’t know it at the time. His name was Dave. He had the most gorgeous eyes. We sat next to each other in class. He was a really nice guy, but didn’t seem to be too smart at math, or much else for that matter. I volunteered to help him, and would even give him some of the stickers that our teacher would give us so that we could turn them in with our tests for extra credit. He had a twin brother that was also cute, but Dave was the best. I wanted to spend as much time with him as I could. I wanted to see him as often as I could. I still couldn’t figure out what I wanted, but I knew I wanted something more. I remember how sad I was when I finally graduated from middle school, knowing I wouldn’t see Dave again. To this day, I sometimes wonder whatever happened to him. I guess some things are better left in the past.

After leaving middle school, I felt that I had finally arrived in a much better school. It was a Catholic school with a mandatory Junior ROTC program (a military program, but with no mandatory military service afterward). I fit in pretty well. I liked most of my teachers. We were required to wear uniforms each day and dress in full military uniforms each Thursday. I didn’t mind this, although I was nervous for the first few days, since we were always inspected by older cadets in morning homeroom. Depending on the inspector, even the slightest infraction could mean detention, demotion or a private “discussion” with our military staff. Some inspectors just looked the other way. The feeling of being looked over from top to bottom, and asked to pull our shirts up to see if our belts were polished, had a certain degree of homoeroticism to it that’s probably hard for a straight guy to appreciate. I remember one inspector that I really liked. His name was Pete. I always loved it when we were inspected by him. He seemed to like me, and we hit it off pretty well. I noticed how good I looked in the uniform, but I also noticed how good the other guys like Pete looked too. In fact, they looked really good. We were required to learn about military history, basic leadership skills, military marching formations and exercises, etc. In my freshman year of high school, I entered a health class taught by a fundamentalist Christian, which proved to be very difficult for me to deal with. When we discussed sexual health in class, the subject of homosexuality inevitably came up. Bear in mind that at this point I wasn’t fully aware of what “homosexuality” was. But based on what my teacher said, you would think that homosexuals were the cause of every evil in society. He showed us videos outlining the evils of the “gay lifestyle” and showing people who had “converted” to a “normal heterosexual lifestyle” by the grace of God. Not knowing any better, I just nodded my head and agreed. At the time I just brushed all of this aside. Gay is bad and straight is good, and that’s all there is to it. I was a perfect little right-wing Catholic. I remember on one occasion Janice worried that my new high school would “turn me gay” since I was around guys most of the time. She was at another public high school. While I don’t think the all-boys atmosphere turned me gay, at least she was half right. We “broke up” in Oct. 2001, mostly because she wanted to spend more time with me and I had no interest in doing so. I wanted to spend my time with guys. The irony of the whole thing was that, a few years later, I would find out that Janice came out of the closet as bisexual! I think God has an interesting sense of humor.

So I was “single” again, and my self-realization of my sexuality was so gradual that I don’t remember when I first said to myself “I’m gay.” It’s not really something that is discovered by some kind of sudden flash of insight, at least not for me. I think my junior year of high school marked the beginning of my realization. By this time, I had progressed to mentally undressing my classmates. By my senior year, I was going much further. I was looking forward to our gym classes where we would practice wrestling on the mats in the gym, grunting and sweating all over each other. In retrospect, I think the only reason I kept myself under control was because I was still in the process of figuring myself out. Toward the end, as homosexual issues began to crop up in the national news more and more, I started to become suspicious of myself. I did my research (by this time I also had a better idea about what homosexuality was) and finally realized the truth. I was gay. I couldn’t help it.

I tried to take interests in other women, girls that my friends would hook me up with, but I wasn’t interested in them at all. I tried to be, but I wasn’t. Women simply did not turn me on. They never really did, even when I occasionally dreamed about them. While other guys would stare at Playboy magazines and howl at the sight of naked women, it never did anything for me. I prayed to Jesus to make the evil go away, but it didn’t. I couldn’t be gay. I wasn’t flamboyant. Even today, I am not the stereotypical gay guy at all. Not all of my friends are girls. I don’t go to gay pride parades. I’m not a Democrat (I’m actually a moderate libertarian). I don’t usually dress in a way that would reveal it or act all that differently. I’m perfectly content to kick back in my jeans and cowboy boots and sip a beer. In retrospect, the fact that I was and still am straight-acting saved me from the taunts and troubles that LGBT teens are often forced to endure.

By the middle of my senior year in high school, I was a closeted gay. Could I come out? I had risen to the rank of Major in the Cadet Corps, the 30-man student group that controls most JROTC related affairs with the cadets, such as daily inspections, training younger cadets in marching and dispensing punishments to misbehaving cadets. I was then given the additional honor of an appointment to the central staff, which was the 5-man junta that directly supervised and controlled the rest of the Cadet Corps and all other cadets. The five of us were the head honchos. I was the chief of the supply distribution office, with the vital job of making sure that our military supplies got to where they needed to be. I was also given the sole authority to grant awards to cadets…or withhold them. I had accomplished so much, and I knew instinctively that to come out would be tantamount to losing it all in a flash. The military faculty members at my high school weren’t much more progressive than my health teacher that I mentioned earlier. I feared the loss of my friends, and the loss of my family as well. I had no clue how they’d react. I then made a plan. I would wait until I graduated high school, and then spring the news on my parents (I considered my sister too young to handle such an admission) and a few select friends.

Some wonder how I survived for 4 years in an environment that is generally considered to be brutally oppressive to homosexuals, a mixture of militarism and Christianity in a high school setting. First of all, to be Catholic and to be a non-celibate homosexual is difficult but not unheard of. Some of my more conservative fellow Catholics would say I’m “living in sin” by rejecting the official dogma requiring lifelong celibacy of anyone with a homosexual orientation. I’ve never heard them make the same criticism of teens who consistently masturbate or have premarital sex, which is also “mortal sin,” but I guess it’s easier to pick on the 10% of the population who are LGBT rather than the 98% who have masturbated at some point. While celibacy is a beautiful gift from God, I don’t think that everyone is called to it. Blessed indeed is the occasional homosexual who is called to it, but the majority probably do what many other Catholics do, and refuse in good conscience to live a life devoid of sexual expression. If one investigates the theological and Biblical underpinnings behind the official Catholic dogma, it’s actually not too difficult to pick it apart. A lot of it comes from a “natural law” concept that is centuries old (which says sex is for procreation only, though that should logically exclude sterile couples from marriage in the Church, which it does not as of now) and 6 passages of the Bible that both Catholic and Protestant Biblical scholars are raising new questions about. The Catholic priests that I consulted varied in their levels of affirmation, but many were affirming and positive, so the religious aspect wasn’t as difficult as it often is for other gay people. In fact, the Catholic brothers and priests at military school never once made a disparaging remark about homosexuality. As for the military aspect itself, that was arguably more difficult to deal with. Luckily there were some moderate and liberal voices in the school, but they were outnumbered. It was hard at many points, especially since it was a same-sex school. But never once did I attempt to get into a relationship with another cadet, especially one of my subordinates. To do so would have been grossly unprofessional, but that’s not to say I was never tempted. One of the miracles of human life is that we survive. We find ways to deal with the toughest of circumstances. There were so many times when I was on the verge of telling friends or a trustworthy teacher, but I just couldn’t do it. My freedom to be who I was born to be was ruthlessly suppressed at all turns. I felt, at times, like I was living in a police state. The atmosphere itself wasn’t so much overtly homophobic, but it was very much of a “don’t ask, don’t tell” attitude. This was just another form of oppression. After a while I began to actually internalize that homophobia, something that I still haven’t totally recovered from. I would toe the line and declare my opposition to homosexuality whenever the topic came up in class. Opposition to homosexuality among the cadets seemed widespread. In the mock elections during the 2004 presidential race George Bush won over 60% of the cadet vote. We were definitely a “red” school. Unfortunately, the homophobic atmosphere probably caused other cadets more hardship than it did for me. I remember once when I was appointed as a drill sergeant for a group of younger cadets. I was to teach them a military marching formation. While we were taking a brief break, a bunch of the other cadets started talking about LGBT people. At one point, someone brought up an interesting question. “What would you do if you were gay?” I tried to keep my distance from that conversation, but I saw one cadet sitting down, silent. I asked him what he would do if he thought he was gay. He looked me right in the eyes and responded that he would commit suicide if he ever discovered that he was gay.

Because any kind of organized LGBT group or opposition was unthinkable, I believe that it left a tough legacy for those in my class struggling with LGBT issues because it meant that once we graduated and were out on their own, we’d have no experience with being who we really were. We’d be more likely to fall into the excesses that I’ve seen other LGBT people fall into: unsafe sex, promiscuity, depression, etc. That one cadet I mentioned was the perfect example of what such a repressive atmosphere can cause. I don’t think he was gay, but all of my cadets were equally valuable to me. It was truly disturbing to hear one of them claiming that suicide was a better option than being gay. I should not have caved in to the homophobia. I should have been more affirming and willing to accept myself then and there. I should have challenged that cadet. I should have made it clear to all of my cadets that, whether gay or straight, that I’d always accept them and help them. I pray that my successors will not repeat my mistakes, and learn to be more open and affirming.

I would later learn that about three other people from my graduating class recently came out of the closet, but I’m sure that there are more out there. In fact, Pete, my former inspector, came out of the closet right after he graduated. I should’ve known. We still keep in touch. He got a prestigious job in Washington DC working for the government, and I’m glad he made out well. At any rate, it’s progress. I learned a lot while at my high school. There is healthy religion and there is pathological religion. There is healthy patriotism and there is fascist militarism. We need to avoid extremes, and so does my old school. I love and miss many people there dearly, and they will always be in my heart, and I hope that things change there for the closeted gay cadets I left behind on the day when I took my diploma and walked out the door. I hope they inherit a better school and better times ahead, and I’m happy to say that there are encouraging signs of progress. I recently talked to one of the younger cadets who just graduated (he’s pro-LGBT since his brother is gay) and he told me that the atmosphere has become a little freer. He told me that more cadets in his class came out of the closet than in mine, and a few even did while still in school! The military staff and our fundamentalist Christian teachers can resist a lot of things, but not a change that is long overdue and inevitable. To all of the cadets that I left behind, don’t deny who you really are. Don’t shut yourself away like I did. Don’t conform to homophobic prejudices. Instead, strive to be like the real Jesus, not the phony, bigoted one that our teachers often presented to us, but the kind, loving God that He is.

I gained admission into college around April of 2005. Things were moving so fast. I went from a shy cadet to a confident, high-ranking officer in the Cadet Corps. I graduated with honors, and I was free. I proceeded not to come out of the closet, but to totally demolish it. The first person I told was my doctor, who encouraged me to do what I felt was right for myself. Finally the day came and, after months of dropping veiled hints, finally sat my parents down and told them the news. The reactions were predictable to me, but not to outsiders looking at my family. My father expressed immediate and unconditional support, and has maintained it to this day. He offered to drive me to gay support groups if I wished, or wherever else I wanted to go. My mother’s eventual reactions made the Hiroshima bomb look like a firecracker. It wasn’t immediate, but I could perceive from her looks and veiled negative quotes that she wasn’t happy about my news and would eventually express it. She was repressing her anger. My father valiantly tried to soothe her, but to no avail. All it would take was a trigger to blow up the relationship between me and my mother. That trigger came all too soon, right as I was moving onto campus.

Apparently my mother was looking through my computer files at home, which I stupidly neglected to password-lock. When she found a conversation between myself and a gay person who was a sophomore at college (nothing explicit or sexual, just a general get-to-know-someone-like-me thing), that was the trigger. One day I took some personal time from college and went to see her where she worked. She pretended I wasn’t there, not even looking me in the eyes. She ordered me out of her office immediately, without explanation. I was puzzled and disturbed, and I immediately called my father, who told me she had found the conversation. He was doing all he could to calm her down. I was livid and deeply upset by this. I finally hung up on my father after a few nasty words to the effect of “you ought to be able to get your own wife under control.” After class that day, I received a message asking for my presence at the college’s resident psychologist. I had a rotten feeling that I knew where this was going, but complied. Upon arrival, my father was there looking concerned and totally at a loss to try to help my mother. My mother was hysterical, crying obscenities. My father tried to stop her, but she wouldn’t stop, so I started with my own abusive rantings. Eventually, we just wore ourselves out with fighting.

We spoke only through my father, who begged me to believe that he was doing all he could. I still don’t know what my sister must have felt, if she even knew what was going on. And so a hellish Cold War lingered between my mother and I for a period of a couple weeks that seemed like years. Finally, in early October I learned that my college’s Gay-Straight Alliance was sponsoring a Coming Out Week. I had already joined the GSA as soon as I had arrived at college, and I thought this would be a good chance to meet other people who were gay or bisexual and listen to their experiences. I was also hoping to meet a guy that I could start up a relationship with (I don’t do hook-ups or stuff like that; monogamy is my middle name). I walked into the room where it was held, and I almost fainted. My mother was sitting in the front row clapping.

My jaw dropped, and I almost turned around and left, but she beckoned me over. I didn’t speak at first, but she knew what I was thinking. “I need time to get used to this. I won’t accept it overnight, but I’ll get better in time. I may take some steps forward and then take a couple backward, but I’ll get there.” I was totally stunned. When the last speaker had finished speaking, the moderator asked if anyone else would like to speak. To my horror, my mother raised her hand and took the stage. She affirmed her love for her gay son (while pointing directly at me and giving my name while I sunk further into my chair!) but also cautioned that it would be a slow process, with regressions at times. And that concluded the first time that I was publicly outed! Finally, I did what I never thought I’d have the courage to do. When she had paused, I walked down the aisle and up to her. “May I?” I asked, pointing to the speaker’s stand. She smiled. “Sure. Go ahead.” At that point, I did something I never thought I’d do. I forgave her. How was I able to do this? It wasn’t so much because of her sudden acceptance, which I suspect my father had a hand in. Instead, it is crucial to note that I am not the type of person that judges others without regard to their personal situations. My mother was raised by a hyper-conservative, racist, homophobic, misogynistic, alcoholic father. Her mother was more educated and tolerant but also alcoholic. Her two siblings basically left her to deal with her parents on her own, until she was finally able to flee her home once she turned 18. Luckily, my mother doesn’t have any of those attributes herself, at least not anymore, but I know it probably colored her world view of LGBT people in a very negative way. She still suffers from growing up in such a terrible environment, and thus I’ve been inclined to leniency when dealing with her. I was able to forgive her much more easily by taking into account this sad, difficult environment that she was forced to grow up in.

My mother was helped along in the acceptance stage when my first cousin, her nephew, also came out of the closet. I can imagine that she probably thought her whole family was going gay! I think by then she began to feel resigned to the fact that she now had two relatives that were gay. My mother went to counseling to get herself past the worst of the acceptance stage. Today, we have a good relationship that I feel is growing. I could hold a grudge against her still. I could oust her from my life if I wanted to. But I wouldn’t do either of those things. I have to give most of the credit to my father, who went through hell trying to get my mother back to reality. In fact, my experience with my father directly contradicts what most gay men experience.

My father’s unquestioning affirmation was what ultimately got me through the worst of times. Actually, to this day I have never fully understood why he has been so accepting. He is, outside of gay issues, pretty conservative. He’s an old-fashioned Vietnam veteran and lived in the south for a while (actually the place where he lived was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina). When I say he was accepting, I don’t just mean tolerant. Not only did he offer to bring me to a gay support group near our home, but he even went one step further. He took me, my mother and sister on a vacation to a gay resort area in Maine. He told me he thought I’d “be a little more comfortable there.” If this wasn’t shocking enough, he then proceeded to drive me to a local gay bar when I didn’t have my car, and to give me tickets to see Brokeback Mountain! As you can imagine, he’s every gay man’s ideal father. Where did this acceptance come from? I can only speculate, but it’s important to compare him to my mother when talking about the two of them. My father was raised in a more progressive home with a loving mother and grandmother. He still saw our Middle Eastern relatives, but for the most part he lived with my Italian Catholic grandmother and her side of the family. My grandmother broke some societal taboos herself by befriending a black woman when she was younger, and attending this woman’s father’s funeral. At the time and place she was raised, whites never went to black funerals. She also befriended a Jewish woman, which was also somewhat taboo before the Second Vatican Council. She was a full-time worker. Seeing her shattering these societal no-no’s made it easier for my father to do the same. One thing that my father really gets irritated about is the assertion that gays should not be allowed to raise children. He reminds me that “I was raised by two women and I turned out fine. They weren’t lesbians, but they were two women living in the same household.” I think that the analogy is somewhat appropriate. Whatever the nature of the relationship, there is no good reason why two men or two women cannot raise a child. My father knew how it felt to have his own family not being respected on an equal footing. When he was in the military during Vietnam, his grandmother died. Although she was essentially a second parent to him, the military would not allow him to take time off to go to her funeral, stating that “she was not a parent or immediate relative.” My father argued that she helped raise him with his mother, but to no avail. I think that all of this shaped my father’s views in a positive way. Simply because something was not the societal norm didn’t make it immoral in my father’s eyes, which made acceptance much easier for him. Recently, I was visiting with his 85-year old great-aunt (my grandmother’s sister), who was also instrumental in helping raise my father. We were watching TV and a gay movie came on. She turned to me and said, “I don’t see why everyone hates these gays so much. They don’t bother anyone.” She then proceeded to watch the movie.

As for the rest of my extended family, I haven’t told most of them, since I don’t see the majority of them often enough to consider it worth my while. I doubt that there would be any severe reactions. My cousin decided to tell his parents, my aunt and uncle, about me. I told him he could, so it was all good. Since they already knew that they had a gay son, a gay nephew was little shock. My uncle supposedly said, “I figured” when he heard about me. I’m not surprised though, since he always was a very perceptive man. My aunt was more surprised and called my mother to ask if it was true. She wasn’t upset at all, just surprised. She talked to my mom about some of her own struggles. Since then, everything’s been fine. Another twist occurred when I was at a family reunion in summer of 2006 meeting people I didn’t even know existed. A cousin came up to me and introduced himself as A.J. My gaydar went crazy, although it probably had more to do with his rainbow wallet! This confirmed my theory that homosexuality runs in families! He was in his early 40’s, although he looked younger, and was so sweet. He seemed very down-to-earth, and admitted that despite his years of experience, I had him fooled. He never would have guessed about me had I not revealed it. A. J. and I still talk to each other as often as we can. He lives in Massachusetts now with his partner, which I’m thankful for, since at least they have the opportunity for marriage.

I’ve talked a lot about my family, but what about my friends? Few of the people I went to high school with know about me. I told my few friends from high school after I came out in college. Most of them don’t care, so it’s been fine overall. One or two didn’t take it well, so those “friendships” ended, but if my coming out was all it took to drive them away, then they really weren’t friends to begin with. At my college, virtually everyone has been supportive. The Gay-Straight Alliance that we have there helped me a lot during my freshman year, when I was in the process of coming out. I can never express my gratitude and affection for those who helped me during the process of coming out, and those who have been so good to me afterward. Most of my friends are straight, and I’d say that about half are men and half are women. That shatters the stereotype of the “gay posse” which is supposed to consist exclusively of women (the so-called “fag hags”). Honestly, there’s nothing particularly remarkable about my social life. My straight friends and I live the same lives. We drink the same beer, go to the same bars, etc. Yep, this is the evil “gay lifestyle” that is supposedly ruining America!

The issue of “gaydar” is something I should address. I am living proof that gaydar is notoriously inaccurate in most people, whether gay or straight, who claim to have it. It basically refers to the notion that some people can instinctively tell when another person is gay or bisexual. In the case of A. J., it was his personal possessions that gave it away, not him as a person. With my other cousin, it was the way he dressed and acted that revealed it. Whenever you see someone wearing or using something with a rainbow on it, that’s usually a telltale sign. A blue square with a yellow equal sign on it represents an American gay rights organization, the Human Rights Campaign, and many gay people display stickers of this symbol on their cars or in other places. But outside of overt physical giveaways, it’s a crapshoot. I’ve encountered very few people who’ve claimed to have had legitimately “good” gaydar. There was one exception, my friend Beth. She was in her 20s and claimed that she took one look at me and figured it out, but she always was highly perceptive about people, like my uncle was. Maybe there are some exceptions, but in general I think gaydar is a false concept. There’s really no way to instinctually “know” if another person is gay or lesbian. Worse yet, even physical appearances can be deceiving. There were plenty of straight guys in my high school who acted gay, even grinding themselves into one another (I had to look away to avoid an embarrassing situation) and then proceed to make out with their girlfriends. Then again, they might have been trying to “bait” me out of the closet. They didn’t succeed, at least in high school. I kept my cover. In the aftermath of the Matthew Shepherd murder, one can never be too careful.

I eventually told my sister. She was about 14 when I told her, but very mature compared to other 14-year olds. I decided she was ready to know. I approached her as she was sitting down watching TV one night. It went something like this:

Me: Hey sis, there’s something I’ve got to tell you.
My Sister: OK, go on.
Me: Well, there’s a reason I’m still single and don’t date women. I’m gay.
My Sister: Yes, I already knew that.
Me: You did?
My Sister: I’ve known for a long time now. I was just waiting for you to tell me.
Me: How did you know?
My Sister: I know you.

As much as I don’t like to admit it, she’s right. She knows me better than anyone else. While growing up, she was a constant companion and playmate. She also provided me with advice when I needed it, and helped me out whenever I called upon her. I spent a greater portion of my life with her than anyone else so far. I should’ve known that she knew. Now there is a greater openness between us, and we can both discuss our lives more freely with each other than we used to.

If you’re wondering why I haven’t talked about any romantic or sexual encounters that I’ve had while at college, it’s not really that I’m ashamed of anything that I’ve done, but that I don’t see any need to go into great detail. Being gay is not solely about sex. I wouldn’t want to be in a relationship that was based solely on sex. What I want, even more than sex, is intimacy. The right-wing forces in this country tend to reduce homosexuality solely to sexual activity, but it’s not only about that, or at least it isn’t for me. It’s about an intimacy that cultivates love itself, and gives true meaning to the term “making love.” It’s a shame that more people don’t understand that. You can have all the sex you want, and still not have love in your life. Without true love, what are we worth?

All of this thoroughly shocked, hurt and then healed me spiritually. I do not feel a contradiction between my Christian faith and my sexual orientation, even though many would see the two as being mutually exclusive. For Catholics, Dignity USA, New Ways Ministry and Fortunate Families are all great, affirming organizations which help those struggling with living in a church that is still officially homophobic (although not nearly as homophobic as other churches or religions). I am still a practicing Catholic, and will remain so regardless of official doctrines.

This is essentially my story. Today, I am still searching for a man to call my partner, boyfriend, etc. I am often disheartened that I am still single, but my faith keeps me afloat. After some interesting dates and conversations, I still haven’t found that special guy, but I’m still looking. I have faith that he’s out there and that someday God will bring us together.

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

A Little Protest With a Lot of Big Hearts

Posted by G G on November 16, 2008

Well, I guess I’ll begin by detailing the events of today. As you might’ve noticed by my biographical information, I am gay and I support full rights for LGBT people. You will learn more about me as time goes on, but for now, let’s just set the backdrop: I’m a white, 21-year old college student majoring in history in a local Catholic university. Yes, there will be lots of interesting things to say about that, but let’s focus on the protest for now.

It was raining slightly, but by the time I had finally arrived on State Street in Albany, NY, it had stopped. I drove up around 1 PM and parked near the Albany City Hall, which was where the protest was taking place. When I first got there, there were only about 30 people or so. I called a friend of mine who lived nearby to come to the protest, since she had indicated interest in being there. She told me she’d be down soon, but for the time being, I stood in the small crowd alone. However, within about a half an hour, the crowd of 30 had swelled to over 300!

Yes, quite a sight indeed! Anyway, my friend and a few other mutual friends arrived, and a few other people from my college also showed up. More would have come, but there was a freshman class trip that got in the way. I hate inconvenient timing! The event was spectacularly coordinated by a student from Albany Law School. There were chants of “what do we want? equal rights! when do we want it? NOW!” I wish I could’ve shouted as well, but my throat was a little scratchy. As we marched around the city hall, dozens of cars and a few firetrucks beeped at us in solidarity. The whole thing was very moving for me.

Now for my impressions: I wish every pro-gay marriage protest throughout America was as civil as this one was. Not a bad word was said by anyone to anyone. Granted, no opponents of LGBT marriage were present, but the crowd was very orderly and respectful. WhatI’m afraid I can’t say the same for some other protests that took place several days ago:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450884,00.htm

While I understand that this is coming from Fox News, let’s give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that this story is true. If so, then I am greatly disturbed. Is this the level that certain people in the LGBT community want to sink to? Pushing old ladies? First of all, she has a right to her opinion, however wrong she may be (and I think she is) to support Prop 8. Second, I don’t know about the protesters that knocked her over, but I was always taught to be considerate toward the elderly. Again, I believe gay marriage should be legal and that this woman’s opinion was wrong, but nothing, and I mean nothing, justifies the type of behavior shown by the protesters. Even if I were hypothetically in that crowd, and the woman struck me first, I would not have hit her back. Wouldn’t it send a stronger signal to simply “turn the other cheek” as Jesus taught? As a Catholic, that’s what I think I would have done. Unfortunately, things like this undermine the case for LGBT rights.

I think that there have also been some tactical problems with the LGBT protests as well. Consider this story:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/1113/p03s07-uspo.html

LGBT people are angry at the passage of Prop 8. Though I am single as of right now, being a gay man, I am also angry at it. That being said, I question the wisdom of protesting the Mormon Church. I say this because when dealing with people who are so deeply entrenched in a homophobic mindset, they’ll typically perceive any kind of slight against them as a vindication of their beliefs! They’ll assume that they’re being “persecuted for the sake of Christ.” While I am not a Mormon and do not share their beliefs, it is an unwise maneuver to provide them with that kind of ammunition. So then what is to be done?

I offer these words of advice for LGBT protesters throughout the country:

1. DO NOT, under any circumstances, use physical force on anyone unless your personal safety is being threatened. I understand that we’re all angry and that this is a highly charged issue, but as Americans we should be above that.

2. Don’t protest at a particular religious establishment or use anti-religious epithets in your protests. Not only does it provide fuel for the opposition to say “look, the gays are persecuting us for our religious beliefs” or something similar, but it also fails to acknowledge the fact that not every member of a particular religious group is homophobic. I recall reading about a Mormon group that urged people to vote no on Prop 8 to keep gay marriage legal, and I’m a practicing Catholic. We need to keep those things in mind. Instead, choose a political place like a city hall or a park, etc. and keep it limited to civil marriage rights or political LGBT issues.

3. See if you can get some LGBT-friendly clergy to come!

4. Keep the language PG-13. Some LGBT people might have their kids there!

5. Make sure you have a permit for the protest, and that traffic is not being obstructed and that local noise ordinances are being obeyed.

6. Contact the press ahead of time.

7. If anti-gay marriage protesters show up, do the one thing that they’ll hate the most: be kind to them. Smile at them, bless them, offer them some food or drinks if you brought any, etc. It will drive them crazy. Remember, they want to demonize the LGBT community and will use any excuse to do so. Don’t give them that excuse.

8. If you can, I would personally act and dress like you would on any other day. Show the world that we’re normal people seeking happiness.

9. Remember that our opponents are people too. They need our mercy and forgiveness, not our hatred. Yes, they took away marriage rights for so many of us. Yes, they try to deny us the ability to adopt. Yes, they try to suppress us in the military and in jobs and housing. Do we need to accept and bear it? No. We need to work at forgiving them, while steadfastly working toward equality for ourselves and our LGBT brothers and sisters.

10. Remember how lucky we are to have the right to protest in this country. And consider the fact that time is on our side. In 2000, the gay marriage ban passed with 61% of the vote. This time it only passed with about 52%. The momentum is going in the right direction, so be patient and we will get there. I promise you that.

I will write more in due time. I hope I didn’t offend anyone and I welcome any feedback. God bless you all!

Copyright © 2008 neverwalkaway.wordpress.com. All Rights Reserved.

Posted in Main | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Why I’m Doing This

Posted by G G on November 16, 2008

Peace be with all of you reading this. I have decided to do a blog in response to the recent election here in the good old USA, and the various issues that have emerged in the wake of Barack Obama’s historic victory. I will especially comment on the various LGBT rights issues that have emerged over the past few years, and especially since the November 4th, 2008 election. I will also comment on Catholic issues, etc. Over time, the issues that I cover and the things that I propose will probably change. As I always say, change is inevitable, except perhaps from a vending machine! God bless you all!

Posted in Main | Leave a Comment »